Status: Primary Source Regulatory Mapping
Jurisdiction Code: USA-PA
Supervisory Model: Bifurcated Federal Structure
1. Statutory Framework
Core Gambling Legislation (State Level)
Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act
4 Pa.C.S. Part II
Act 42 of 2017 (Pennsylvania Gaming Expansion Act)
58 Pa. Code — Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board Regulations
Anti-Money Laundering Legal Basis (Federal Level)
Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 (31 U.S.C. § 5311 et seq.)
31 U.S.C. § 5312(a)(2)(X)
31 CFR § 1010.100(t) — Definition of “Casino”
31 CFR Chapter X
31 CFR Part 1021 — Rules for Casinos and Card Clubs
Casinos with gross annual gaming revenue in excess of $1,000,000 are classified as “financial institutions” under 31 U.S.C. § 5312(a)(2)(X), as implemented by 31 CFR § 1010.100(t), and are subject to federal anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act framework.
2. Primary Gambling Supervisor
Regulatory Authority: Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board (PGCB)
Legal Basis: 4 Pa.C.S. § 1201 et seq.
Core Regulatory Instruments
- Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act
- 58 Pa. Code (PGCB Regulations)
- Licensing investigations and suitability determinations
- Internal control submission and approval requirements
The Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board exercises state-level regulatory authority over licensed casino and online gaming operators within Pennsylvania.
3. AML Oversight Ecosystem
- Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) — Administrator of the Bank Secrecy Act
- Internal Revenue Service (IRS) — Delegated authority to conduct Title 31 compliance examinations of casinos
- U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) — Criminal enforcement of federal AML statutes
Under 31 CFR § 1021.210, casino operators must implement a written AML program, including internal controls, independent testing, employee training, and designation of a compliance officer.
Federal AML supervision operates independently of state gambling regulatory supervision.
4. Reporting Architecture
Internal Compliance Controls
- Written AML program pursuant to 31 CFR § 1021.210
- Designation of a compliance officer
- Independent testing
- Employee training
Suspicious Activity Reporting
SAR-C filing requirement under 31 CFR § 1021.320
Triggering threshold: Transactions involving or aggregating ≥ $5,000
Reports filed electronically through the FinCEN BSA E-Filing System
Currency Transaction Reporting
CTR-C filing requirement under 31 CFR § 1021.311
Triggering threshold: Cash transactions > $10,000 in a single gaming day
Federal reporting obligations apply uniformly across states and are not displaced by state gambling regulatory reporting requirements.
5. Supervisory Model Classification
- State-level gambling supervision under the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board
- Federal AML supervision under the Bank Secrecy Act (FinCEN / IRS)
Banking supervision of financial institutions interacting with casino operators is conducted by federal banking regulators and is institutionally separate from state gambling regulators.
6. Public Enforcement Framework
Federal
- Civil money penalties under 31 U.S.C. § 5321
- Criminal liability under 31 U.S.C. § 5322
Federal enforcement actions are published by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and FinCEN.
State
- Administrative sanctions under 4 Pa.C.S.
- License suspension or revocation
State enforcement actions are published through official Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board communications.
There is no unified statutory maximum cap applicable across federal and state enforcement layers; penalties arise under their respective statutory frameworks.
7. Primary Source Registry
- Pennsylvania Race Horse Development and Gaming Act (4 Pa.C.S. Part II)
- Act 42 of 2017
- 58 Pa. Code (Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board Regulations)
- Bank Secrecy Act (31 U.S.C. § 5311 et seq.)
- 31 U.S.C. § 5312(a)(2)(X)
- 31 CFR § 1010.100(t)
- 31 CFR Part 1021
- 31 U.S.C. §§ 5321–5322
8. Data Classification Notice
This page contains primary-source statutory and supervisory references only.
No analytical scoring, interpretative grading, or risk classification is included in this data layer.