Status: Primary Source Regulatory Mapping
Jurisdiction Code: USA
Supervisory Model: Bifurcated Federal Structure
1. Statutory Framework
Core Gambling Legislation
Gambling regulation in the United States is primarily exercised at the state level. Each state enacts its own gambling statutes, including commercial casino statutes and tribal gaming frameworks. There is no single unified federal gambling statute governing commercial casino operations nationwide.
Anti-Money Laundering Legal Basis
Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 (31 U.S.C. § 5311 et seq.)
USA PATRIOT Act of 2001
31 U.S.C. § 5312(a)(2)(X)
31 CFR Chapter X
31 CFR Part 1021 – Rules for Casinos and Card Clubs
Casinos meeting the statutory revenue threshold are classified as “financial institutions” under 31 U.S.C. § 5312(a)(2)(X) and are subject to federal anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing obligations under the Bank Secrecy Act framework.
2. Primary Gambling Supervisor
Regulatory Authority: State-Level Gambling Regulators (varies by jurisdiction)
Legal Basis: State Gambling Statutes and Administrative Codes
Core Regulatory Instruments
- State gaming control statutes
- Administrative regulations
- Internal control requirements
- Licensing and suitability determinations
- Enforcement proceedings
Gambling supervision in the United States is exercised by state-level regulatory bodies. There is no centralized federal gambling supervisory authority for commercial casinos.
3. AML Oversight Ecosystem
- Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) – Administrator of the Bank Secrecy Act
- Internal Revenue Service (IRS) – Delegated authority to conduct Title 31 compliance examinations of casinos
- U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) – Criminal enforcement of federal AML statutes
Under the Bank Secrecy Act framework, casino operators must implement written AML programs, conduct customer due diligence, maintain records, and file required reports in accordance with federal law.
AML supervision operates at the federal level and is institutionally separate from state gambling regulatory supervision.
4. Reporting Architecture
Internal Compliance Controls
- Written AML program pursuant to 31 CFR § 1021.210
- Designation of a compliance officer
- Independent testing for compliance
- Employee training
Suspicious Activity Reporting
SAR-C filing requirement under 31 CFR § 1021.320 (transactions involving $5,000 or more)
Currency Transaction Reporting
CTR-C filing requirement under 31 CFR § 1021.311 (cash transactions exceeding $10,000 in a single gaming day)
Reporting Channel
Electronic filing through the FinCEN BSA E-Filing System
Federal reporting obligations apply uniformly across states and are not displaced by state gambling reporting requirements.
Supervisory Engagement
- IRS Title 31 examinations
- Civil money penalty assessments
- Referrals for criminal investigation
5. Supervisory Model Classification
- State-level gambling supervision under individual state statutes
- Federal AML supervision under the Bank Secrecy Act (FinCEN / IRS)
Banking supervision is exercised separately by federal financial regulatory authorities and is not administered by state gambling regulators.
6. Public Enforcement Framework
Federal
- Civil money penalties under 31 U.S.C. § 5321
- Criminal liability under 31 U.S.C. § 5322
Federal enforcement actions are published by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and FinCEN.
State
- Administrative sanctions under applicable state gambling statutes
- License suspension or revocation
State enforcement actions are published through respective state gaming regulatory authorities.
There is no unified nationwide statutory cap applicable across all state and federal enforcement layers; penalties arise under their respective statutory frameworks.
7. Primary Source Registry
- Bank Secrecy Act (31 U.S.C. § 5311 et seq.)
- 31 U.S.C. § 5312(a)(2)(X)
- 31 U.S.C. §§ 5321–5322
- 31 CFR Chapter X
- 31 CFR Part 1021
- USA PATRIOT Act of 2001
8. Data Classification Notice
This page contains primary-source statutory and supervisory references only. No analytical scoring, interpretative grading, or risk classification is included in this data layer.