Corrections Policy

GamingMarkets is committed to accuracy, accountability, and transparent correction of material errors. This policy explains how GamingMarkets reviews correction requests, how changes are classified, and how corrections and updates are displayed across research, news, briefings, and data products.

Scope

This policy applies to all GamingMarkets publications and data products. GamingMarkets reviews and corrects material factual errors, including errors related to jurisdiction, regulator identity, legal status, enforcement actions, dates, figures, and source attribution. Where clarification is required to avoid misunderstanding, GamingMarkets may publish clarifications without changing the underlying factual record.

Definitions

Correction refers to a change made to address a factual inaccuracy (for example: an incorrect date, regulator, legal status, enforcement outcome, figure, or source attribution).
Clarification refers to a change that improves clarity or context where the underlying factual record remains accurate.
Update refers to a change made when new official information changes the underlying factual or regulatory position (for example: amended legislation, new regulator guidance, a new enforcement notice, or a revised official filing).
Material correction refers to a correction that could affect interpretation of a regulatory status, enforcement outcome, financial figure, market implication, or conclusion drawn from the reported facts.

How to Request a Correction

Correction requests should be submitted by email to: [email protected]

To allow prompt review, requests should include:

The URL of the relevant page.
The specific statement, figure, table entry, or passage in question.
A concise explanation of what is incorrect or unclear.
Where available, a link to supporting primary documentation issued by a competent authority or an official corporate filing.

Review Process

GamingMarkets reviews correction requests by validating the relevant claim against documented sources. Where multiple official documents exist, the most current authoritative version is prioritized. If a claim cannot be supported by accessible documentation, it is not maintained as a verified fact.

Following review, GamingMarkets will determine whether the appropriate action is a correction, clarification, update, or no change. GamingMarkets maintains an internal audit record of material changes.

How Corrections and Updates Are Displayed

GamingMarkets does not rely on silent edits for material factual changes. When a material correction is made, the publication will display an updated timestamp and a brief description of the change (for example: “Correction” or “What changed”). Updates driven by new official information are displayed in the same manner where they materially change the underlying factual or regulatory position.

Non-material, non-substantive edits that do not change meaning (such as typographical or formatting fixes) may be made without a public correction note. Where relevant, such edits may still be recorded internally.

Data Products and Trackers

For regulatory tables, trackers, and indices, GamingMarkets applies additional correction and verification rules:

Each entry is tied to a competent authority or regulator and includes a primary source link where available.
Status fields reflect documented positions (for example: proposed, adopted, in force, enforcement action).
Material changes to an entry require an updated Last verified date.
If an entry cannot be re-verified against primary documentation, the status is not presented as current.

Limits

GamingMarkets does not modify verified factual statements solely on the basis of private claims that cannot be supported by accessible documentation. Requests seeking removal or alteration of accurate, documented information may be declined.

Methodology & Verification
Editorial Independence
About GamingMarkets

Contact

For corrections and editorial inquiries: [email protected]